IngramChen 積分 0

產能應該都放在筆電了吧

5000U 考慮看看

koji 積分 1

if Telegram introduces premium stickers with additional expressive features, the artists who make stickers of this new type will also get a part of the profit

貼圖商店了嗎~

zaguan 積分 2

G 社高層都一直這種高高在上的態度... 他們就是登記在開曼群島的外商。 八卦:產品長就是第一代發表時,20 萬天價被釘爆的行銷長。 聽說後來背黑鍋去 MTK 蹲了一陣子,還在臉書上發表了一些不得志的言論。後來又回來接產品長 (因為行銷長已被別人坐走了)。科科。

haocheng 積分 0

每年的 JCConf 能夠成功舉辦都靠科斯高/OCF 幫忙,希望大家可以考慮捐款支持他們

indigo 積分 0 編輯於

提供幾個數字做為參考,首先是文章提到的:

Ultimately, Slack was ripe for the taking. Entering 2020 it had lost around 40% of its value since it went public. Consider that after its most recent earnings report, the company lost 16% of its value, and before the Salesforce deal leaked, the company was worth only a few dollars per share more than its direct listing reference price. Toss in net losses of $147.6 million during the two quarters ending July 31, 2020, Slack’s uninspiring public valuation and its winding path to profitability and it was a sitting target for a takeover like this one. The only surprise here is the price.

Slack’s current valuation, according to both Yahoo and Google Finance, is just over $25 billion, which, given its very modest price change after-hours means that the market priced the company somewhat effectively. Slack is up around 48% from its valuation that preceded the deal becoming known.

而 2016 年有新聞說微軟將 Slack 視為價值高達 80 億美元的潛在收購目標。1

haocheng 積分 0

補充一下是 twitter 上看到的

https://twitter.com/hjc4869/status/1333270931901452288

@hjc4869: 能耗比的骗局:Apple M1运行Cinebench R23的能耗比接近默频下Zen 3的3倍,可是当你把Zen 3压到跟M1相同的功耗(~3.7W),M1的能耗比优势就只剩下30%。

其实之前Torvalds就讨论过这个topic,只要你不停地降频就能获得更好的PPW。然而桌面CPU这样做没意义,牺牲了面积效率。

https://t.co/AhhhMohRC6
kakashi 積分 1

ARM 的架構本來就是走 low power 比較強,clock 方面其實 apple 已經拉得很高了,足以符合一般人的需求

kakashi 積分 1

Apple 的 cpu 一直都是單核很猛啊,看 multiple core 其實也有點鑑別程度,尤其用在 notebook 上面

chchwy 積分 1

我只是不太懂為什麼要拿製程出來比?

haocheng 積分 0

一般使用者根本不會看比分數據啊,會看的人不就是要知道細節嗎? =_=

chchwy 積分 0 編輯於

作為使用者,不需要去想幾奈米吧? 我們只關心「現在這個時間點」用起來的效能阿。

反正我是看不懂作者的邏輯,這一點點分差就可以叫做 destroy?

haocheng 積分 0

也要考慮一下是 14nm/7nm vs. 5nm 吧…

chchwy 積分 0

用了 Destroy 這個動詞還以為差距有多大...結果點進去看...

popcorny 積分 0

直覺覺得 risc 會比較容易衝高時脈,畢竟指令相對單純。且 mobile 跟 server 的架構我相信會不同優化方向,現在看 m1 數據就做此推斷好像有點早。

IngramChen 積分 0

The problem is that ARM architecture doesn't clock very high and has high leakage at high power levels (this is also conversely true, x86 is not very good at low power scenarios)

是這樣?ARM 頻率沒辦法撐高嗎?那之後的 M2, M3... 不就...

haocheng 積分 1 編輯於

法庭上的對話還蠻好笑的 XD